Threadlinqs IntelligenceStart free

VulnerabilityCVE-2026-84897Published 2026-10-07

CVE-2026-84897 — wolfSSL Inc. wolfSSH

medium (derived)

As of 2026-10-07, CVE-2026-84897 is a Medium-severity (band derived from the CVSS v4.0 score, not stated by the CNA) vulnerability in wolfSSL Inc. wolfSSH, CVSS v4.0 6.9, EPSS 0.3% (20.9th percentile). Threadlinqs Intelligence links 1 tracked threat campaign to CVE-2026-84897, most recently “wolfSSH 1.6.0 patches 5 vulnerabilities incl. critical ECDSA host-key MITM (CVE-2026-16516) and Windows wolfSSHd auth-token reuse (CVE-2026-83540)”.

CVSS v4.0
6.9/10Medium (derived)
EPSS
0.3%Higher than 20.9% of scored CVEs
CISA KEV
NoNot in the KEV catalog
Tracked threats
1Campaigns referencing it
Priority
4.3/10Threadlinqs triage score
Published
CVSS v4.0 6.9 (Medium, derived from score) · EPSS 0.3% (higher than 20.9% of all scored CVEs) · Priority 4.3/10 · Published 2026-10-07

Last updated:

What is CVE-2026-84897?

src/internal.c in wolfSSL wolfSSH through 1.5.0 admits the server-to-client Diffie-Hellman group exchange messages SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP (31) and SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY (33) when a server receives them from an unauthenticated client. IsMessageAllowedServer() applies no direction check to the key exchange message range: when the peer is keying and no particular message is expected, which is the state a server is in for the whole window after it processes the client's KEXINIT because nothing sets handshake->expectMsgId there, the function falls out of its expectation branch without a verdict and reaches a numeric bound that admits every message id from 30 through 34. A client that negotiates diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 and then sends message 31 makes the server run the client-side handler DoKexDhGexGroup(), which validates the attacker-supplied group with two 8-round Miller-Rabin primality tests, one on p and one on (p-1)/2, on a value of up to 8192 bits. The handler then returns success: the server stores the attacker's prime and generator, generates a Diffie-Hellman key pair in the attacker's group, and sends the client-role message SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT (32) back to the attacker. Published RFC 3526 safe primes are the worst-case input and cost the attacker nothing to obtain. The primality validation was added in 1.5.0; versions from 1.2.0 through 1.4.22 admit the same message and enter the same client-role path without the primality cost. Message 33 is admitted as well, but on a server it is rejected before any cryptography because no public key check callback is registered, so it carries no comparable cost. Builds that define WOLFSSH_NO_DH_GEX_SHA256, which is implied by WOLFSSH_NO_DH or NO_SHA256, are unaffected.

The record classifies CVE-2026-84897 under weakness classes CWE-372, CWE-405, CWE-400. 1 affected-product entry is recorded, across 1 vendor, listed below. The identifier was first published 3 days ago.

Severity and exploitation probability

CVSS v4.0 base score
6.9 — Medium (derived from score)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y
EPSS (FIRST)
0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 20.9% of all scored CVEs
CISA KEV
Not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
Threadlinqs priority
4.3/10 — a Threadlinqs composite of the CVSS base score, the EPSS percentile and public exploit availability
Published
2026-10-07

Is CVE-2026-84897 being exploited?

It currently carries a trending score of 39 in the Threadlinqs vulnerability feed.

Affected products and versions

How to fix CVE-2026-84897

No vendor patch reference has been recorded for CVE-2026-84897 in the tracked sources. Follow the references below for a fix, and treat the products listed above as exposed until the vendor states otherwise.

Threat activity tracking CVE-2026-84897

1 tracked threat in the Threadlinqs corpus references CVE-2026-84897, either in the campaign’s CVE list or as an indicator on the campaign record.

Sources

Enriched from CVE.org, FIRST EPSS. Last verified by Threadlinqs on .

Vendor advisory and patch

Technical analysis